|
|
Tuesday, March 16, 2004
One year ago Rachel Corrie died!
|
|
|
One year ago Rachel Corrie died crashed by an Israeli bulldozer... she was 23 years old and she was trying to prevent Israelis from demolishing a Palestinian's home.
This is a sad day for me and for everyone is fighting for human rights in Palestine..... and it should be a sad day also for all Americans, who lost an intelligent and brave girl with a kind heart.... willing to help who nobody cares to help....
It's really hard for me to express my feelings in this bitter day... why this world is running for power and money and people can't see the sufferings of other people?
Why there is a total indifference when other people are dying and starving? Why the football championship is more important than a people being murdered?
Now you are sure wondering what Israelis said about her... well, look at this "memorial" published my Jerusalem Post and relative letter to the editor and editor's reply:
Mar. 1, 2004
A 'tribute' to Rachel Corrie
By RUHAMA SHATTAN
March 16 is the first anniversary of Rachel Corrie's death. I want to thank Corrie for the explosives that flow freely from Egypt to Gaza, via the smuggling tunnels under the Gaza homes that she died defending.
Perhaps it was these explosives that in the year since her martyrdom – oops, death – have been strapped around suicide bombers to blow up city buses and restaurants in Israeli cities, particularly in Jerusalem, killing men, women, and schoolchildren (two of them classmates of my daughter and her friend in the February 22, 2004 bombing), and leaving hundreds more widows, orphans, and bereaved parents.
On the first anniversary of her death, I want to thank Rachel Corrie for showing Palestinian children how to despise America as she snarled, burned an American flag, and led them in chanting slogans, and as she gave "evidence" at a Young Palestinian Parliament mock trial finding President Bush guilty of crimes against humanity.
Perhaps her help in fanning the flames of violent anti-American sentiment led to the October 2003 bombing of the Fulbright delegation to Gaza to interview scholarship candidates, killing three. There will be no new crop of Palestinian Fulbright scholars this fall.
ON THE first anniversary of her death, I wanted to thank Rachel Corrie for providing her organization, the Palestinian-sponsored International Solidarity Movement, with the opportunity to release a manipulated photo sequence "showing" an Israeli military bulldozer deliberately crushing her. (I would also like to thank AP and The Christian Science Monitor for taking up the baton and immortalizing this cynical ISM stunt.)
On the first anniversary of her death, I want to thank Rachel Corrie for showing the way to all those who seek peace in the Middle East. Unfortunately, Corrie's peace, as anyone familiar with the PLO, Fatah, Hamas, and Hizbullah organizations that she defended with her life knows – or as anyone familiar with the weekly rants of the Friday preachers in the Palestinian mosques is aware – means not peaceful coexistence but the elimination of the State of Israel, and death to those they call "the usurping Jews, the sons of apes and pigs."
Thank you, Rachel Corrie, of Evergreen State University, where the profs wear khakis and keffiyehs at graduation ceremonies, for showing us what peace really means.
The writer is a translator, editor, and writer who has lived in Israel since 1976.
---------------------
Mar. 3, 2004
Letters to the Editor
Disgusting 'tribute'
Sir, – I want to pass on the US Embassy's reaction to the article "A 'tribute' to Rachel Corrie" (March 2). This article is nothing less than hateful incitement. The author's disgusting abuse of the anniversary of the death of this American citizen is inexcusable. The article reflects a level of discourse unbefitting any serious newspaper.
We're disappointed that you chose to publish this article.
PAUL PATIN
US Embassy
Tel Aviv
...no, it was fitting
Sir, – I want to commend Ruhama Shattan for her fitting "tribute" to Rachel Corrie. While all citizens of Israel clearly regret the rare loss of any innocent life resulting from IDF operations, it must be made clear who is innocent and who is not.
Corrie died while engaging in deliberate incitement and dangerous activity that, as Shattan points out, perhaps led to the death of many innocent Israelis. Exercise of free speech is a respected right in this country, and there are proper ways to go about demonstrating against policies with which one disagrees. While Corrie's family and friends may have difficulty understanding the reality in which Israelis live, in this country when the IDF gives an order, those orders are to be followed. Interfering with army activities is a crime and those who do so should no longer be considered innocent.
While Corrie's death was undoubtedly an accident, it resulted from a personal arrogance that led her to believe her moral high ground was more powerful than the IDF. She died simply because she was willing to do so, in an effort to make a point to the world.
No army in the world goes to such lengths as the IDF to avoid the loss of those engaged in innocent activity. Rachel Corrie's actions were far from innocent.
KENNETH POLINSKY
Ma'aleh Adumim
I don't wanna go on, I don't know what to say.....
I suggest you to check the article her cousin Elizabeth wrote on this anniversary, A year of silence since Rachel Corrie died.
And now I will leave you to a poem written for her....
| "On the brink of..."
Suheir Hammad, Poetry, 20 March 2003
On the brink of
tears, sanity and war,
I feel powerless, hope
less and less than alive.
What do we tell young
people? How do we say, "...your
voice means nothing to those
who think life is about power
over others and greed?" And where
is it safe to think for yourself and try
real hard to not want to hurt nobody?
I don't want to hurt nobody, God knows.
In Iraq, children are looking towards
the night sky with fear, as though
there were no stars, only bombs in the cosmos.
And they are afraid of the earth because
they can count the cancers in their
hoods now, where once there were none.
And how do I tell American youth
that popular culture means nothing to
justice and everything to keeping them
numb to the world? And how do I
scream when I have no voice left?
And who will answer these questions for me?
Not Rachel Corrie. She is dead.
And no matter what any army says,
I have seen the photos
and that woman was wearing orange,
bright and alive one minute and dying
under rubble the next. Even I, it seems, have
developed a callousness to the deaths of
Palestinians, because the murder of this white
girl from Olympia, Washington has
my heart breaking and my blood faint.
Something like ten Palestinians have been killed since
yesterday, when a Caterpillar bulldozer driven
by a man demolished the home that was her body.
If anyone knows her family, please relay
to them my grief and my sorrow.
You can still find her phone number
on the Internet for meetings and organizing. You
can still read her accounts of being in Palestine.
She was a good writer.
There are people who are writing,
"She should not have been there in the first place"
Now she is dead.
"Good riddance"
Now she is dead.
"Treasonous bitch"
Now she is dead.
What do I tell young people about non-violence when they can see
for themselves
how even orange bright and megaphone loud
and cameras and US citizenship will
not stop your murder?
I recall the days black boys were lynched
and dismembered for looking at white women,
now tax dollars are crushing dissent
wherever it blooms.
Human shields for human targets.
There are words I am taking back. I reclaim them
and will no longer allow anyone to dictate my language.
There is no "right wing" a wing is of nature, and murder
may be human, but it is not natural,
even if animals eat each other,
is that what we are then, animals?
If so, claim it, motherfucker.
There is no "mother of all bombs".
Blair, Sharon, Bush, all have
mothers and no matter what they do, there is
something they love.
White power, oil, the need to be God's
only chosen, whatever, but they love something, because
their mothers loved them.
A bomb loves nothing, has no mother and
is not about life.
There is no mother of all bombs,
only more mankind self-destruction.
There is no safety in being a bully. I know
because I have been bullied and I know now,
with my first grey hair and all, that authentic
power is not about others but about self.
This is not a poem. This is not a threat.
This is a promise.
God has a better imagination
than all of us combined and I do not
know what form retribution will take, but
I have seen karma happen and it will
again, and when it does I will chant
the names of the innocent and I will stand
with those who have kept their hands clean of blood
and their hearts clear of hate.
It is hard not to hate right now. But I
have been loved, I have loved and I know
that those who de-humanize their enemy are
only doing so to themselves.
Peace work is justice work is God's work.
Rachel Corrie wrote,
"Nevertheless, I think about the fact that no
amount of reading, attendance at conferences,
documentary viewing and word of mouth could have
prepared me for the reality of the situation here.
You just can't imagine it unless you see it, and even
then you are always well aware that your experience
is not at all the reality: what with the difficulties the
Israeli Army would face if they shot an unarmed US
citizen, and with the fact that I have money to buy water
when the army destroys wells, and, of course, the fact
that I have the option of leaving. Nobody in my family
has been shot, driving in their car, by a rocket launcher
from a tower at the end of a major street in my hometown.
I have a home. I am allowed to go see the ocean."
She is dead now. And the ocean
will miss her gaze. Palestine will miss
her heart, but mostly her family will
miss her breath.
And the president of the United States of America
(when did that happen again?) has all
but declared war on Iraq, and so more deaths are
promised.
What do I tell young people about any thing?
Especially humanity and morality.
Slightly a month before her murder Rachel wrote home,
"Many people want their voices to be heard, and I
think we need to use some of our privilege as
internationals to get those voices heard directly in
the US, rather than through the filter of well-meaning
internationals such as myself. I am just beginning to
learn, from what I expect to be a very intense tutelage,
about the ability of people to organize against all odds,
and to resist against all odds."
More words I reclaim: Hero, Brave, Soldier.
This young woman did the un-thinkable,
she did not blink, did not half-step, did not back
down in the face of death. What greater odds than
one lone female frame against a destructive
machine?
What greater story to tell?
On the brink of war, may our power
come from the people Rachel Corrie was murdered
defending. On the brink of war, may our hope
come from one another. On the
brink of -- wait -- this is not a war.
On the brink of whatever new-fangled
imperialist project this is, may Rachel Corrie
live in our resistance, in our pursuit
of justice, and in the spirit of sisterhood.
On the brink of war, may we remember how divine
human beings can be.
-- Suheir Hammad
Suheir Hammad is a Palestinian-American poet living in New York City.
Posted at 5:46:45 pm by palestine
Making Sense of Rachel Corrie’s Death
by Haithem El-Zabri - March 16, 2004
The untimely death of Rachel Corrie has stirred passions and controversy across the world, and undoubtedly touched many people. Her heroism has been recognized, and clinics, streets, organizations, and even Palestinian children have been named after her. Her death touches many issues, including human ethics, injustice and oppression, and politics.
Compassion, Self-Sacrifice, Courage
Rachel will be long remembered for her human compassion and her selflessness in standing up for what is right, even when risking her personal safety. Her e-mails from Gaza to her family in the United States all articulated the great injustices she saw inflicted against civilians, and she pointed to the complicity of the U.S. government, and the world’s indifference. Rachel was tormented by such destruction of lives and homes, victimization of young and old alike, and Israel’s cruel collective punishment of a captive population.
Unable to be a passive bystander, Rachel courageously blocked a 9-ton bulldozer from demolishing another Palestinian home, fully aware that the bulldozer driver belonged to an army that has killed thousands of civilians. For that, Rachel will forever be a shining example of compassion, self-sacrifice, and courage.
Rogue Israel
Israel’s illegal occupation of the Palestinian territories has become more oppressive than ever, especially with Ariel Sharon as Prime Minister. During the past three years, the Israeli Occupation Forces have killed more than 2,800 Palestinians, mostly civilians and including children, as well as demolishing numerous homes leaving thousands of Palestinians homeless, confiscating lands, uprooting trees, and even firing at schools, hospitals, mosques, churches, medics and journalists. Israel has detained men, women, and children without charge, and the Knesset has endorsed the policy of “targetted assassinations” of political leaders, often killing bystanders too.
Israel’s disregard for international law, human rights, and bodies such as the United Nations, is unparalleled. After Israel’s brutal assault on the Jenin refugee camp in April 2002, Israel refused to allow a UN to investigate allegations of a massacre, and even refused entry to rescue teams aiming to find survivors still under the rubble of the hundreds of demolished homes. The bulldozer driver who demolished most of the homes, even with their residents inside, was awarded a medal of honor. Two years later, when the International Court of Justice convened to discuss the Apartheid Wall that Israel is building within the occupied territories, Israel boycotted and condemned the session, and sped up construction of the wall.
Israel’s indifference to international public opinion enables it to target human rights activists and journalists. Less than 3 weeks after Rachel’s murder, activist Brian Avery, 23, from New Mexico, was shot in the face. Less than one week after that, yet another activist, Tom Hurndall, was shot in the head as he tried to rescue Palestinian children from Israeli gunfire. And 3 weeks after that, British journalist James Miller was shot and killed, while wearing clear “TV” markings.
Four direct attacks on internationals in the space of less than 2 months. Were these accidents, or a calculated warning to keep international human rights activists away? Such brutality indicates that Israel believes it is above international law, and with the US standing firmly by its side, it does get away with murder.
Complicity of the US Government
The United States provides astounding amounts of economic, military, and diplomatic support to Israel, enabling it to continue committing such crimes with impunity. The F-16s that bomb crowded residential areas in Gaza, the Apache helicopters that fire missiles in targetted assassinations, the M-16 rifles that are used to shoot unarmed civilians, and the Caterpillar bulldozers that raze home after home, are all supplied by the US, even in violation of its own Arms Export Control Act. When the international community attempts to condemn Israeli crimes, the US consistently vetoes such resolutions at the UN. The US can only be seen as a direct accomplice in Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people, and equally responsible for them.
US foreign policy often seems to put Israeli interests ahead of American interests – one glaring example is when Israeli forces deliberately sank the USS Liberty in 1967, killing 34 American sailors and wounding 172. The US government covered up the details and insisted that it was an accident – even though survivors provide clear evidence to the contrary. Now, a foreign army has murdered a US citizen, and the US government is satisfied with an Israeli army verdict that proclaims itself not guilty!
Solidarity with Palestine
In these modern times, when there are principles of human rights and international law, bodies such as the United Nations, and conventions such as the Geneva Convention, one would imagine that such crimes against humanity can be halted. However, Israel continues these crimes unabated, and the Palestinian people feel abandoned and betrayed by the world community.
But one ray of light comes from a group of international activists focusing on non-violent resistance to the occupation - the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). Rachel Corrie belonged to this group, as did Tom Hurndall and Brian Avery. ISM volunteers come from all over the world to help protect Palestinian civilians and to bear witness to Israel’s crimes. They ride in ambulances to discourage the Israeli army from blocking their passage, they protest the building of the Apartheid Wall, and they stay in Palestinian homes that are in danger of being demolished.
ISM’s work has given hope to the Palestinian people that they have not been completely abandoned, and that there are individuals who will stand up and oppose the continuing injustices, even at great personal risk. Rachel Corrie has become the poster child of true compassion and solidarity.
Haithem El-Zabri is the webmaster of Rachel Corrie’s Memorial web site, www.rachelcorrie.org.
Posted at 4:50:52 pm by palestine
The Impact of Zionism on Jewish, Christian and Muslim Relations
Dr Anthony McRoy
The sign of a good conference is when the time flies, so interesting are the contributions. This was certainly true of the Friends of Al-Aqsa conference on ‘the impact of Zionism on Jewish, Christian and Muslim relations’ on March 15 at SOAS, University of London. Speakers included Rabbi Yisroel Weiss of Naturei Karta International, Egyptian professor Abdalwahab Elmessiri, Israeli lecturer Dr Ilan Pappe, Dr Azzam Tamimi of the Muslim Association of Britain Evangelical Christian leaders Rev Steve Sizer and Rev. Garth Hewitt. Everyone attending would agree that it was an inspiring, dynamic and enthralling conference. Many inter-faith meetings are tiresome affairs, basically centring on the need to be nice to each other; this event, by contrast, was almost like an American Christian ‘revival’ meeting, with people acknowledging past faults, facing the problems square in the eye, and presenting solutions to the most difficult and painful issue in relations between the faiths – Palestine.
Rabbi Weiss began the meeting with a lucid and fascinating historical overview of Judaism and its relation to Zionism. Bluntly, he described Zionism as the work of Satan, and the godless opposite of Judaism. It was a desecration of God’s name. In fact, he later equated Zionism with the idolatry that plagued Israel in Biblical times, and deserving God’s wrath. The Land was given to the Jews only on the basis that they obeyed God’s law, and the reason the Canaanites were expelled – for lack of holiness – also applied to the Jews. Jews were exiled as God’s punishment for their sins, and only God could restore the people to the Land. Trying to return en masse apart from the divine miracle incurs God’s punishment. Zionism was the offspring of the secularising ‘Reform’ movement that compromised Judaism. Repeatedly, Weiss emphasised that prior to Zionism, Muslim-Jewish relations were mainly good, and would be again once Zionism was dismantled.
Sizer gave a clear and interesting two-part talk on Christian Zionism, noting its 19th century origins in the work of Irishman JN Darby that spread across American Evangelicalism (though still a minority), and how this affected both US and British politicians. He also later looked at how this interpretation of Biblical prophecy had been translated both into political lobbying by Christian Zionists today and the increasing Islamophobia of this group. Perhaps the worst example of this was when he quoted a recent speaker at the Southern Baptists Convention who described Muhammad as a ‘demon-possessed paedophile’, which drew an audible shocked gasp from the audience. Elmisseri a scholar on Zionism, noted that Zionism and Anti-Semitism had a common goal – the removal of Jews from Europe, and that it was typical of Western colonial norms – exporting problems to the East. Both he and Tamimi confessed that in their younger days they were too sweeping in their judgment of Jews, failing to distinguish them from Zionists. Zionism had provoked Muslims into a misreading of history and Quranic texts in relation to the Jews. Both talked about how their pilgrimage of learning had brought them into contact with good Jews.
This was one of the most important theme of the conference – the distinction between Zionism and Judaism. Despite the recent smears of a Zionist Labour MP against him, hiding behind Parliamentary privilege, Tamimi has waged a courageous campaign around this very issue, fighting Muslim anti-Jewish sectarianism, as his website demonstrates. Sometimes Muslims employ the term ‘al-Yahud’ as a synonym for the Zionists. This was what made the speeches of Rabbi Weiss and the other Jewish speaker, Dr Pappe, so vital in educating Muslims against this tendency. Muslims were able to see that Zionism and Judaism are not the same, and this was an excellent contribution to reconciliation. Tamimi saw a continuing place for Jews in a ‘post-Israel’ Middle East, and stated an apt slogan, ‘No to Israel, yes to the Jews’.
Perhaps the most vital and interesting contribution was from Dr Pappe. He told how his spiritual journey from Zionism had been in three stages. The first was as a young student in the 1970s in Oxford when he learnt that the ‘history’ his society had taught him about the Nakba was a lie. He started at-first a lonely struggle to expose the truth, which is better known today. Recently, more has come to notice about the rapes, massacres and ethnic cleansing in 1948. Unlike some Palestinians willing to surrender the cause, he was organising a right of return conference in Haifa. The second stage of his journey was against Fear – specifically Islamophobia, which the regime encourages to sustain unity and support for draconian policies. The final stage was for relevance, which was difficult given the subtle pressures in Israeli society against change and revealing the truth about 1948. Encouraging, he noted that the global Anti-Zionist coalition was growing and broadening, and that Israeli leaders knew time was running out. There was a need for the de-Zionising of Palestine.
Two important themes of the conference were the rejection of the two-state solution and the affirmation of the right of return by all contributors. As Pappe emphasised, what was envisaged was a return to their original homes by the refugees – not to the West Bank or Gaza. Weiss noted that demographic developments pointed to Arabs becoming an absolute majority in all of Palestine very soon. As Pappe noted, there was a need to dismantle the Apartheid character of the Zionist State. As knowledge of the truth spreads in Western societies, they will pressure their governments to change pro-Israeli policies, as happened regarding South Africa. Tamimi called for a ‘United States of the Middle East’, which he noted was just a dream at present. However, it should be noted that there are moves to make the Arab League more effective and integrated, and there are calls for an ‘Arab Union’ on the model of the EU, so perhaps Tamimi’s vision is prophetic. Ismail Patel, Chair of Friends of Al-Aqsa concluded rightly by noting to transport, the goodwill, clear education and dynamic nature of the conference to the wider public and hopefully motivate people to pursue the right of return and the vision of a free, united Palestine with equal rights for Jews, Muslims and Christians with greater vigour and confidence.
Posted at 4:00:26 pm by palestine
Sunday, March 14, 2004
THE RACHEL CORRIE MEMORIAL DAY TO END THE OCCUPATION IN PALESTINE
Day of action and vigils to honor the memory of Rachel Corrie
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004, Palestinians, Internationals, and
Israelis will hold a day of action and vigils to honor the memory
of American ISM peace activist Rachel Corrie and to continue to
highlight the ongoing atrocities within the Occupied Palestinian
Territories.
At 12:00 noon, activists from the ISM and Israeli peace groups
will hold a "die-in" at the international crossing of the Erez
checkpoint to Gaza. This action will be held in order to continue
the work and spirit of Rachel Corrie who was killed by an Israeli
military bulldozer while trying to prevent the demolition of a
civilian home in Rafah on March 16, 2003. In her honor, this
event will illustrate the ongoing daily violence, killing, and
collective punishment within the Gaza Strip and the continued
refusal of the international community to intervene.
For further information, contact Gabe (ISM): +972.55.725.958 or
Flo (ISM): +972.64.309.753
At 6:00 pm, the Grassroots International Protection for the
Palestinian People (GIPPP) is holding a candlelight vigil in honor
of Rachel Corrie. This memorial will begin at the Manara in
Ramallah with attendance from internationals of the ISM and
GIPPP, Palestinian Organization, and Israelis.
For further information, contact Bahia (GIPPP): +972.67.907.492
At 10 am, the community of Rafah will hold a demonstration to
remember Rachel Corrie who lost her life at the hands of the
Israeli Army while in Rafah. This event will begin at the main
square of Rafah and procede along the main avenue.
For further information, contact Adwan (Rafah) +972.59.304.628
Posted at 12:07:19 pm by palestine
Thursday, March 11, 2004
McBusted: McDonald's manager admits speaking Arabic led to firing
McBusted: McDonald's manager admits speaking Arabic led to firing
Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada, 10 March 2004
 |
| Abeer Zinaty, as pictured in Ma'ariv newspaper, wearing her "Excellent Worker 2003 -- McDonalds Israel" T-shirt. | Abeer Zinaty, the 20-year-old McDonald's employee in Israel who says she was fired by the world's biggest fastfood chain for breaking a ban on speaking Arabic in the workplace, has spoken to the Electronic Intifada of the circumstances surrounding her dismissal. Her account flatly contradicts claims by McDonald's head office in the United States that Zinaty's dismissal had nothing to do with her speaking Arabic. Considerable weight is added to her version of events by documents in the hands of the Electronic Intifada.
Senior McDonald's managers, both in America and Israel, who separately responded to protests over Zinaty's dismissal, offered starkly differing interpretations of the company's policy on the speaking of Arabic in the workplace. And the firm's subsequent claims - in the face of mounting bad publicity - that Zinaty was fired instead for a poor work record are apparently not supported by evidence that McDonald's ever initiated a disciplinary procedure against her or sent her letters of warning. They also fly in the face of the company's decision six months earlier to award her "Excellent Worker 2003".
It has also emerged that Zinaty's case was brought before a committee of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, which considered whether McDonald's had broken the country's Equal Opportunities in Employment Law, which forbids discrimination on the basis of race or nationality. Following a special hearing on February 23, the Labour, Welfare and Health Committee concluded that McDonald's sacking of Zinaty was "inhumane and immoral" and that she should be reinstated immediately.
So far neither McDonald's Israel nor the McDonald's Corporation in the US has made any contact with her.
Zinaty began work for the McDonald's branch in Ramle, a mixed Arab and Jewish town close between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, in April 2001 and was awarded the title "Excellent Worker" two years later, in April 2003. She was fired months later, on December 21, when she was called in on her day off to see the branch manager, Hazem Natche, an Arab from East Jerusalem.
"There had been some discussion that I was in line for promotion so when I got the call I was sure it was to offer me a more senior job in the company," she said. "I couldn't believe it when he said I was being fired. He told me there were several problems with my work but that the main thing was that I was talking too much Arabic."
McDonald's has emphasised that Natche himself is an Arab, thereby implying that his decision was not racially motivated. However, Zinaty observes that Natche - who is the regional inspector supervising six branches in Israel - had instructed workers not to speak Arabic in front of customers and refused to speak any Arabic at work himself.
"One of the topics of conversation among the Arab workers was why he always spoke Hebrew, even in private in his office. The general view was that he had received orders from head office that Arabic should be banned on the premises."
She added: "When he fired me - even though only the two of us were in the room - he spoke the whole time in Hebrew. It was crazy: an Arab telling another Arab that she was fired in Hebrew. I was confused and so scared to reply in Arabic that I left without saying anything to him."
Despite the subsequent claims of the company that the sacking of Zinaty had nothing to do with her speaking Arabic, Natche himself contradicts that position. In a handwritten letter to a local Arab newspaper, sent on February 5 by McDonald's PR company in Israel, Tikshoret Asakim, he justifies his decision on several grounds including that: "Abeer Zinaty spoke Arabic to her Arabic co-workers while she was on duty, even though Abeer knows that Hebrew is the language for interpersonal communications at work, in order that her colleagues whether new immigrants or Jews understand the orders sent to the kitchen."
It is also surprising that McDonalds now vehemently denies that the dismissal had anything to do with speaking Arabic when it has repeatedly stated in all correspondence that there is a ban in the workplace on Arabic, which is spoken as a first language by nearly 20 per cent of Israel's population.
What is unclear is the extent and purpose of the ban. Julie Pottebaum, a spokeswoman for McDonald's US head office, based in Illinois, told the Electronic Intifada on March 5 that Hebrew "is required to be spoken when on duty in order to best conduct business and best serve our customers". This response was disturbing, given that such a policy appears to violate Israel's Equal Opportunities in Employment Law, which outlaws discrimination on the basis of race or nationality. Arabic, along with Hebrew, is an official language of the state.
| "As far as is known, Israel is the only country in the world where McDonald's staff are ordered to talk only one language while on duty." | But Pottebaum's statement also raised the question of why Arabic is banned in the workplace in Israel when McDonald's prides itself on promoting ethnic diversity and tolerance. As far as is known, Israel is the only country in the world where McDonald's staff are ordered to talk only one language while on duty.
However, Pottebaum's interpretation of McDonald's policy, which comes in the wake of allegations by the Electronic Intifada of racism against McDonald's Israel, is more liberal than original statements made by the company following Zinaty's dismissal. In the first official correspondence from the company, dated January 27, Talila Yodfat, the Israeli chain's human resources director, denies that Zinaty was fired for speaking Arabic but continues: "There is a directive known to all chain employees, that restaurant staff will speak, among themselves and with clients, only in the Hebrew language. This is in order to prevent discomfort felt by clients and staff, who mostly speak Hebrew."
The comment that customers, including the 20 per cent who are likely to be Arabs, might be made "uncomfortable" by Arabic being spoken appears subsequently to have caused Yodfat herself some discomfort - when the statement came under scrutiny from the Knesset. In a letter dated February 23 and addressed to a lawyer for Mossawa, an Israeli Arab political lobbying group that is helping Zinaty, she retracts that part of the letter, blaming the McDonald's lawyer who drafted it of having misquoted her.
"Since my letter dated January 27, 2004, was addressed to an attorney, I was assisted in its composition by the company's legal consultant, advocate Ronit Tzafrir, who phrased the letter in accordance with the spirit of my words. In the gap between my spoken words and their printing, a human error occurred in the fifth paragraph. I did not notice this error before signing the letter, since what I had before me was the spirit of the letter."
"To remove all doubt, I hereby wish to emphasize that the only language-related directive that exists in the chain refers to the professional language, which is spoken in the kitchen and in the intercom system that links the cash registers and the kitchen. It is self-evident that the employees may conduct small-talk in any language whatsoever. Our employees may speak any convenient language to the clients, and we even encourage them to do so."
| "McDonald's is an American company and, as in every McDonalds in the world, we all refer to the items on the menu in English. How would I say Big Mac or McNuggets in Arabic anyway?" | Zinaty, however, has nothing but scorn for the claim that she was placing meal orders in Arabic. "I do not deny that I spoke Arabic at work to my Arab friends but never when placing orders. McDonald's is an American company and, as in every McDonalds in the world, we all refer to the items on the menu in English. How would I say Big Mac or McNuggets in Arabic anyway?"
She points out that the company's argument that Hebrew is needed to avoid "miscommunication" holds little water. "What Arab employee is going to speak Arabic to a Jew who knows only Hebrew? It would be self-defeating. We all know each other and know what languages each of us can speak."
In yet another version of her dismissal, Irina Shalmor, a spokeswoman for McDonald's Israel, told Electronic Intifada on March 7 that Zinaty was causing trouble at the branch so that she would be made redundant and could claim unemployment benefit.
"That's nonsense," said Zinaty. "I am studying film and television at university and desperately need money to pay my way. Now I'm unemployed and in serious financial difficulties. McDonald's was the perfect work for me because I could choose the number of hours I worked and tailor them to my university timetable. Why would I get myself sacked when the unemployment rate here is 11 per cent and rising?"
After examining Zinaty's dismissal, the Knesset Committee on Labour, Welfare and Health issued a statement on February 23 admonishing McDonald's for firing Zinaty, which it called an "inhumane and immoral" act, and demanding that she be reinstated in the Ramle branch.
Shaul Yahalom, the chair of the committee, said: "I was not convinced regarding the motive for the dismissal of the employee, but in a humane and moral society it is not possible to dismiss an employee who worked for the company for three years [and] received certificates of excellence, without any written warning."
The committee was particularly critical of the inconsistency in McDonald's management statements. Ariella Padan, deputy to the chairman of McDonald's Israel, told committee members that McDonald's did not ban personal conversations between ermployees in Arabic or in any other language. But, the committee emphasised, that contradicted Yodaft's comments. It concluded that it appeared "Abeer Zinaty was indeed fired because she breached the directives included in the letter by Ms Talila Yodfat."
Zinaty, however, is not hopeful that she will ever be reinstated. "McDonald's is big and wealthy enough to ignore my problems," she said. She added that she had heard that two other McDonald's workers in Israel had been fired for speaking Arabic but, unlike her, they were too frightened to come forward. "These sackings are working. People really are too scared to talk Arabic at work in McDonald's."
Jonathan Cook is a journalist whose work has appeared in the Guardian, International Herald Tribune, Al-Ahram Weekly, and other newspapers. Based in Nazareth, Cook is an occasional contributor to EI.
Related Links
BY TOPIC: McDonald's Israel's ban on Arabic -- includes all of the original documents mentioned above and translations from Hebrew and Arabic into English.
Posted at 4:43:27 pm by palestine
Israel marks International Women's Day with the killing of two young Palestinian mothers March 9, 2004
A young Palestinian mother was shot dead today as she tried to usher her
children to safety when Israel began intensive raids into the West Bank
city of Jenin.
Witnesses said twenty three year old Dalal Sabaa was on the roof of her
house in the eastern neighborhood of the city when an Israeli sniper
killed her with one shot to the head. Among her other children, Dalal
leaves behind a one month old baby.
Today's invasion of Jenin began around 12:00 pm, as dozens of Israeli
tanks, jeeps and armored vehicles invaded the city in the northern West
Bank. The troops converged on the city from several entrances and were
supported by at least two helicopters overhead.
The Israeli forces imposed a curfew over the city, and took up positions
on roof tops as soldiers began surrounding houses. Gun fire rang out as
the troops fired randomly and indiscriminately. A photo journalist
working with the "Reuters" news agency was injured when he was shot in
the leg by a live bullet. Witnesses also reported that a communication
tower belonging to the "Jawwal" Palestinian mobile phone company was
damaged, in the incursion.
In another tragic case, a 34-year-old woman from the Gaza Strip city of
Rafah, died in a local hospital today having suffered severe injuries
during a shelling attack on her home five days ago. The attack which
also killed her husband caused Ietimad, who had been six months pregnant
to loose her unborn baby. Dr. Ali Musa the head of "Abu Yousef Al
Najar" hospital in Rafah today announced that Ietimad Kalab had been
unable to recover from the injuries she sustained to her head and chest
and had also died.
Dr. Ali Musa confirmed that the couple leaves behind a two year old son,
Mohammad, who too was injured in the shelling attack on March 4 and is
fighting for his life in intensive care.
For more information contact: The Palestine Monitor
+972 (0)2 298 5372 or +972 (0)59 387 087
Posted at 4:31:44 pm by palestine
Beit Duqqu - Where soldiers charge peaceful demonstrators
SUNDAY, MARCH 7
Today at 1 pm a group of about 150 Palestinians from surrounding villages, 7 internationals, and Arik from Rabbis for Human Rights went to peacefully confront two Caterpillar drills working the rocky hillside of Beit Duqqu to prepare the land for the construction of the Apartheid Wall. Demonstrators walked up the rocky hillside and sat around one of the Caterpillars at which point it stopped working. At this point there were two soldiers and three private, heavily armed security guards.
After 30 minutes, five more soldiers arrived and demonstration leaders asked the shebab (youth) to move further down the hill and away from the anticipated violence from soldiers. Those who remained sitting near the Caterpillar to continue preventing it from working were Palestinian women and older men, and the internationals. Slowly, soldiers joined by border police grew to 20 and began to surround the sitting demonstrators.
Around 2 pm the soldiers began to violently push the sitting demonstrators down the rocky hillside, hitting many with wooden and rubber-coated metal batons. People were dragged across rocks while others were shoved off of 5-foot cliffs. Some of the older women and men did not get up and move. After going limp with their bodies, they were roughly picked up by the soldiers and dropped further down the hillside.
Soldiers then threw concussion grenades directly towards the peaceful demonstrators as well as the crowd of shebab to disperse and attempt to incite the crowd. Once the demonstrators had been moved to a suitable distance from the Caterpillar, soldiers formed a security line between it and the demonstration.
One Palestinian grandmother, who owned the land being destroyed, remained behind the security line. Her presence single-handedly continued to prevent the Caterpillar from restarting its work. After about 20 minutes, five soldiers picked her up roughly and dragged her across the rocky slope. After she had been removed, the Caterpillar continued its work.
More soldiers arrived, and as the Caterpillar needed more room to work, soldiers charged the crowd from several directions attacking the peaceful demonstration with their boots and batons, pushing the crowd further down the rocky hillside, and inflicting many with injuries.
This pattern of attacking the peaceful demonstration in order to "protect us" from the potential of falling rocks as the Caterpillar moved horizontally across the hillside repeated itself for the duration of the day. Despite the soldiers’ attempts to incite the crowd to violence, the demonstration remained peaceful in its resistance. There were over 20 injuries from the batons. The demonstration ended at 5 pm, as the villagers and internationals returned to the center of Beit Duqqu, leaving behind the laughing soldiers, and their taunting of the retreating crowd.
MONDAY, MARCH 8
This morning at 9 am a group of 250 Palestinians and 25 internationals and Israeli peace activists set out from Beit Duqqu to the worksite where initial work for the Apartheid Wall is occurring on the opposite hillside from the village center. Demonstrators began walking down the hillside, as the road had been blocked at the base of the hill by a roaming Israeli checkpoint of two military jeeps. As the demonstration reached the bottom of the hill, it split itself into two separate marches.
The first group, of less physically-able people, began to walk along the road and towards the checkpoint. The second group continued to march through the hillside. As the first group reached the checkpoint, concussion grenades were fired at the crowd and people were prevented from passing through. At this point the second group, the one walking through the hillside, climbed up some rocks and reached a point in the road which was past the checkpoint. Soldiers, realizing their security line had been breached, immediately chased after this second group in one of the jeeps, hoping to prevent it from reaching the base of the hill where work was occurring.
With half the soldiers from the checkpoint now gone and chasing after the group which breached their security line, the first group, which was stuck at the checkpoint, now began to march past the remaining soldiers. As they walked past the checkpoint, soldiers fired more concussion grenades at the peaceful crowd.
At 9:55, demonstrators had reached the work site and seized it, thus stopping the construction by the Caterpillar drill. A group of Palestinian women sat on top of the Caterpillar, while others began to sit on the ground and surround it. Several more soldiers arrived bringing their total to 13, and within 15 minutes they had grown to about 30 and were loading tear gas into their vest pockets and guns.
At 10:25 soldiers gave an order to demonstrators to disperse peacefully by 10:45 or the soldiers would use force to clear the area and allow the construction to continue.
At 10:30 soldiers had grown in number to 40, and five minutes later began to fire tear gas and concussion grenades into the peaceful crowd before beginning to beat them with their boots and batons. Some demonstrators were pushed off 5-8 foot cliffs. A concussion grenade exploded directly on a man’s stomach who was lying directly under the Caterpillar’s drill tip. He was then beaten in the head by a soldier’s baton and suffered serious injuries. He had to be carried down the hill by others in the crowd. The soldiers’ charge lasted over 10 minutes and included more tear gas and concussion grenades. Another Palestinian man was struck in both eyes by the shrapnel from an exploding concussion grenade and is currently still blind at the writing of this report. Several others were taken to Ramallah Hospital after suffering broken limbs from the soldiers’ batons.
For the next several hours, soldiers intermittently used violence to push the peaceful demonstrators further down the hillside away from the Cat. and across the arbitrary security lines they were enforcing. The demonstration remained completely peaceful despite soldiers’ attempts to provoke the crowd into violent reactions from their brutal actions.
From 11:30-5 pm, demonstrators peacefully watched construction continue as soldiers took turns taunting various individuals in the crowd and sharing laughs amongst themselves. Soldiers also continued to kick people with their boots and beat people with their batons as demonstrators slowly crossed the arbitrary security lines.
Around 4:30 soldiers posed for a group picture and at 5:00 work ceased for the day, ending the incessant sound of rock drilling which had reverberated through the valley of Beit Duqqu since the day began. The remaining demonstrators returned to the village center of Beit Duqqu to get some well-needed rest.
Posted at 4:26:18 pm by palestine
MOBILIZATION CONTINUES IN BUDRUS
Residents remain steadfast in their struggle for their land
[Budrus, RAMALLAH] Tomorrow, Friday 12, 2004, residents of Budrus and
international peace activists will march to the cleared land of the
Apartheid Wall site where the work continues. They will meet in front
of Budrus mosque at 12:30 and march to the olive groves where seventy
trees have already been uprooted.
Earlier this week, the Israeli army claimed they would move the path
of the Wall closer to the Green Line. However, major discrepancies on
the location of the Green Line exist between Palestinians and the
Israeli army and Wall's foundations have already been laid throughout
olive groves. Therefore, Budrus locals are still mobilized as the
planned construction of the Wall will completely surround nine
villages of this area, turning them eventually into prisons for their
residents and making it difficult for them to access education, health
cares and jobs.
Despite army's attempts to intimidate demonstrators, the residents
have remained steadfast in their nonviolent struggle against the Wall
and against this massive violation of basic human rights.
For more information, please contact:
Abu Ahmed (local contact): +972.67.924.952
S'ra (ISM activist): +972.67.862.226
ISM Media Office: +972.22.77.46.02
Posted at 4:22:02 pm by palestine
DEMONSTRATION IN BIDDU TOMORROW
[Biddu, Northwest Jerusalem] Tomorrow, Friday, March 12, 2004,
Palestinians, Internationals and Israeli activists from Rabbis for
Human Rights will gather outside Biddu municipality Council at 1pm.
They will then march to the hill overlooking the Wall work site and
plant trees which have been donated by Rabbis for Human Rights.
This demonstration will take place the day after the second hearing at
the Israeli Supreme Court which issued an order to cease the work on
the Wall for another week in the area. Meanwhile, the Israeli army has
started to work in Beit Duqqu which constitutes a loophole in the
Court decision.
Residents of Biddu, Beit Surik, Qattana, Al Qubeiba, Beit Anan, Beit
Lekiya, Beit Duqqu and Beit Ijza remain mobilized in their struggle
against the Apartheid Wall which eventually will take off 51,650
dunums of their lands.
For more information, please contact:
Neal (ISM Activist): +972.66.346.165
ISM Media Office: +972.22.77.46.02
Posted at 4:19:16 pm by palestine
Tuesday, March 09, 2004
Now, what about a nice poem?
I just love this poem and I like to share it with you all.
It has been written by a Palestinian young guy, and dedicated to American people.
The best I got to read so far!!!!
Look into my eyes
And tell me what you see
You don't see a damn thing,
'cause you can't possibly relate to me.
You're blinded by our differences.
My life makes no sense to you.
I'm the persecuted Palestinian.
You are the American red, white and blue.
Each day you wake in tranquility.
No fears to cross your eyes.
Each day I wake in gratitude.
Thanking God he let me rise.
You worry about your education
And the bills you have to pay.
I worry about my vulnerable life
And if I'll survive another day.
Your biggest fear is getting ticketed
As you cruise your Cadillac.
My fear is that the tank that just left
Will turn around and come back.
America, do you realize,
That the taxes that you pay
Feed the forces that traumatize
My every living day?
The bulldozers and the tanks,
The gases and the guns,
The bombs that fall outside my door,
All due to American funds.
Yet do you know the truth
Of where your money goes?
Do you let your media deceive your mind?
Is this a truth that no one knows?
You blame me for defending myself
Against the ways of Zionists
I'm terrorized in my own land
And I'm the terrorist?
You think that you know all about terrorism
But you don't know it the way I do.
So let me define the term for you.
And teach you what you thought you knew.
I've known terrorism for quite some time,
Fifty- four years and more.
It's the fruitless garden uprooted in my yard.
It's the bulldozer in front of my door.
Terrorism breathes the air I breathe.
It's the checkpoint on my way to school.
It's the curfew that jails me in my own home,
And the penalties of breaking that curfew rule.
Terrorism is the robbery of my land.
And the torture of my mother.
The imprisonment of my innocent father.
The bullet in my baby brother.
So America, don't tell me you know about
The things I feel and see.
I'm terrorized in my own land
And the blame is put on me.
But I will not rest, I shall never settle
For the injustice my people endure.
Palestine is OUR land and there we'll remain
Until the day OUR homeland is secure.
And if that time shall never come,
Then they will never see a day of peace.
I will not be thrown from my own home,
Nor will fight for justice cease.
And if I am killed, it will be for Falasteen.
It's written on my breath.
So in your own patriotic words,
Give me liberty or give me death.
by Jihad Ali
Posted at 11:26:52 am by palestine
|
|
|